Search for: "Livington" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2018, 4:37 am by Brian Leiter
Via philosopher David Livingtone Smith on twitter, I was led to this much better analysis and takedown of the huckster du jour. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:59 am
According to the Livington County Sheriff, she was airlifted to Mott’s Children’s Hospital in Ann Arbor with severe and serious injuries. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
  (When writing about the origins of the Federal Reserve, it's hard for me not to mention James Livington's Origins of the Federal Reserve System: Money, Class, and Corporate Capitalism, 1890-1913 [Cornell, 1986]--so I just did.) [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 4:35 pm
It was ironic for me that at a bar association meeting on labor & employment law yesterday, that I learned that Ruth Pulda, a partner at Livington, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly, passed away at the much-too-early age of 53. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
In order to prevail on this claim, the plaintiff must establish both that the defendants "failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; see Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010) and that their breach of this duty proximately caused her actual and ascertainable damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 5:22 am
  Livington, a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and former EEOC General Counsel, pointed out, many employers know about giving employees 45 days to consider separation agreements arising out of layoffs. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:24 pm by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270 [1993]; Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407 [2007]; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691 [2007]; Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648 [2007]; Kotzian v McCarthy, 36 AD3d 863 [2007]), while others hold that it must be "a" proximate cause of damages (Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793 [2007]; see e.g. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270 [1993]; Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407 [2007]; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691 [2007]; Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648 [2007]; Kotzian v McCarthy, 36 AD3d 863 [2007]), while others hold that it must be "a" proximate cause of damages (Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793 [2007]; see e.g. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:15 am by Sarena
Everything is happening for the first time:  As author Lesley Livington elegantly said, YA Lit is about firsts. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270; Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691; Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648; Kotzian v McCarthy, 36 AD3d 863), while others hold that it must be "a" proximate cause of damages (Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793; see e.g. [read post]